Hartung, B., & Kersten, D. (2002). Distinguishing Shiny
from Matte.
Presented at Vision SciencieS, Sarasota, Florida.
Hartung, B., & Kersten, D. (2002). Distinguishing shiny from matte [Abstract]. Journal of Vision , 2(7), 551a, http://journalofvision.org/2/7/551/, DOI 10.1167/2.7.551.
This quicktime movie (4.6Mbytes) shows how motion can affect material appearance.
Now with a croissant-shaped object:
Many observers report that this polygonal object seems to look transparent rather than shiny-opaque.
And the last one shows the "wrong" optic flow, in which the environment is moving about a different axis than the teapot.
The highlights at points of high curvature in this last one conflict to some extent with the matte interpretation, and thus one can see these points as from a shiny object. Also, note the lack of contact information (inter-reflections are not modeled in this rendering) for the handle and spout.
Movies were created by Bruce Hartung in collaboration with Dan Kersten and advice from Ted Adelson. The measured illumination map was obtained from http://www.debevec.org/Probes/.
This study was reported at the 2002 meeting of the Vision ScienceS Society in Sarasota, Florida:
Hartung, B., & Kersten, D. (2002). Distinguishing Shiny from Matte.
Presented at Vision SciencieS, Sarasota, Florida.
For more on human perception of shiny objects, see also :
R.W. Fleming, R.O. Dror, and E.H. Adelson. How do Humans Determine Reflectance Properties under Unknown Illumination? Ê Proceedings of the Workshop on Identifying Objects Across Variations in Lighting at CVPR, Hawaii, December, 2001.
R. O. Dror, E. H. Adelson, and A. S. Willsky. Estimating surface reflectance properties from images under unknown illumination. In SPIE Conference on Human Vision and Electronic Imaging, San Jose, CA, 2001.
and
http://www.ai.mit.edu/people/rondror/Ronfiles/publications.htm
© 2003 Computational Vision Lab, University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology.