Ordered References
I. Introduction
1. Loncaric, S., A survey of shape analysis techniques. Pattern Recognition, 1998. 31(8): p. 983-1001.
2. Bookstein, F.L., Shape and the information in medical images: A decade of the morphometric synthesis. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 1997. 66(2): p. 97-118.
3. Koenderink, J.J., Solid Shape. 1990, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Grenander, U., Elements of pattern theory. Johns Hopkins series in the mathematical sciences. 1996, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. xiii, 222.
5. Foley, J., et al., Computer Graphics Principles and Practice. 2nd ed. 1990, Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
6. Leyton, M., Symmetry, Causality, Mind. A Bradford Book. 1992, Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
7. Rock, I., C. Schreiber, and T. Ro, The Dependence of 2-Dimensional Shape Perception on Orientation. Perception, 1994. 23(12): p. 1409-1426.
8. Treisman, A., et al., Form Perception and Attention - Striate Cortex and Beyond. Visual Perception: The Neurophysiological Foundations, 1990: p. 273-316.
II. Shape: Computational Theory
9. Blake, A., Computational modelling of hand-eye coordination. Philosophical Transactions Royal Society Lond, 1992. 337: p. 3510360.
10. Kontsevich, L.L., Defaults in stereoscopic and kinetic depth perception. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences, 1998. 265(1406): p. 1615-1621.
11. Mamassian, P., D. Kersten, and D.C. Knill, Categorical local-shape perception. Perception, 1996. 25(1): p. 95-107.
12. Hoffman, D.D. and M. Singh, Salience of visual parts. Cognition, 1997. 63(1): p. 29-78.
13. Saiki, J. and J.E. Hummel, Connectedness and the integration of parts with relations in shape perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 1998. 24(1): p. 227-251.
14. Siddiqi, K., et al., Shapes, shocks and wiggles. Image and Vision Computing, 1999. 17(5-6): p. 365-373.
15. Pizlo, Z., A. Rosenfeld, and I. Weiss, The geometry of visual space: About the incompatibility between science and mathematics. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 1997. 65(3): p. 425-433.
16. Pizlo, Z., A Theory of Shape Constancy Based on Perspective Invariants. Vision Research, 1994. 34(12): p. 1637-1658.
17. Pizlo, Z. and M. Salachgolyska, 3-D Shape Perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 1995. 57(5): p. 692-714.
18. Landy, M.S., et al., Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: In defense of weak fusion. Vision Research, 1995. 35: p. 389-412.
19. Maloney, L.T. and M.S. Landy. A statistical framework for robust fusion of depth information. in SPIE Visual Communications and Image Processing. 1989.
20. Uttal, W.R., et al., Motion and shape in common fate. Vision Research, 2000. 40(3): p. 301-310.
21. Uttal, W.R., N. Liu, and J. Kalki, An integrated computational model of three-dimensional vision. Spatial Vision, 1996. 9(4): p. 393-422.
22. Johnston, E.B., B.G. Cumming, and M.S. Landy, Integration of Stereopsis and Motion Shape Cues. Vision Research, 1994. 34(17): p. 2259-2275.
23. Young, M.J., M.S. Landy, and L.T. Maloney, A Perturbation Analysis of Depth Perception from Combinations of Texture and Motion Cues. Vision Research, 1993. 33(No. 18): p. 2685-2696.
25. Zhu, S.C., Embedding Gestalt Laws in Markov Random Fields. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence., 1999. 21(11).
III. Shape perception & behavior
26. Bülthoff, H.H. and H.A. Mallot, Integration of depth modules: stereo and shading. Journal of the Optical Society of America, A, 1988. 5(10): p. 1749-1758.
27. Tittle, J.S., et al., The perception of scale-dependent and scale-independent surface structure from binocular disparity, texture, and shading. Perception, 1998. 27(2): p. 147-166.
28. Rogers, S., H.C. Li, and J.L. Dannemiller, Scaling Not Disparity Curvature, Explains 3-D Shape Perception. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 1995. 36(4): p. S185-S185.
29. Johnston, A. and P.J. Passmore, Independent Encoding of Surface Orientation and Surface Curvature. Vision Research, 1994. 34(22): p. 3005-3012.
30. Mamassian, P. and M.S. Landy, Observer biases in the 3D interpretation of line drawings. Vision Research, 1998. 38(18): p. 2817-2832.
31. Freeman, W.T., The generic viewpoint assumption in a framework for visual perception. Nature, 1994. 368(7 April 1994): p. 542-545.
32. Adelson, E.H., Lightness Perception and Lightness Illusions, in The New Cognitive Neurosciences, M.S. M. Gazzaniga, Editor. 1999, MIT Press: Cambridge, MA. p. 339-351.
33. Knill, D.C. and D. Kersten, Apparent surface curvature affects lightness perception. Nature, 1991. 351: p. 228-230.
34. Bloj, M.G., D. Kersten, and A.C. Hurlbert, Perception of three-dimensional shape influences colour perception through mutual illumination. Nature, 1999. 402(6764): p. 877-879.
35. Kersten, D. and P.W. Schrater, Pattern Inference Theory: A Probabilistic Approach to Vision, in Perception and the Physical World, R. Mausfeld and D. Heyer, Editors. 2000, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Chichester.
36. Hogervorst, M.A. and R.A. Eagle, Biases in three-dimensional structure-from-motion arise from noise in the early visual system. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences, 1998. 265(1406): p. 1587-1593.
37. Dehaan, E., R.G.F. Erens, and A.J. Noest, Shape from Shaded Random Surfaces. Vision Research, 1995. 35(21): p. 2985-3001.
38. Reichel, F.D., J.T. Todd, and E. Yilmaz, Visual-Discrimination of Local Surface Depth and Orientation. Perception & Psychophysics, 1995. 57(8): p. 1233-1240.
39. Curran, W. and A. Johnston, Three-dimensional curvature contrast - Geometric or brightness illusion? Vision Research, 1996. 36(22): p. 3641-3653.
40. Lappin, J.S. and W.D. Craft, Foundations of spatial vision: From retinal images to perceived shapes. Psychological Review, 2000. 107(1): p. 6-38.
41. Quinlan, P.T. and G.W. Humphreys, Perceptual Frames of Reference and 2-Dimensional Shape- Recognition - Further Examination of Internal Axes. Perception, 1993. 22(11): p. 1343-1364.
42. Driver, J. and G.C. Baylis, Tilted Letters and Tilted Words - a Possible Role for Principal Axes in Visual Word Recognition. Memory & Cognition, 1995. 23(5): p. 560-568.
43. Pani, J.R., et al., Imagining projective transformations: Aligned orientations in spatial organization. Cognitive Psychology, 1996. 31(2): p. 125-167.
44. Sinha, P. and E. Adelson. Recovering reflectance and illumination in a world of painted polyhedra. in Proceedings of Fourth International Conference on Computer Vision. 1993. Berlin.
45. Wagemans, J., Detection of Visual Symmetries. Spatial Vision, 1995. 9(1): p. 9-32.
46. Lehrer, M., Shape perception in the honeybee: Symmetry as a global framework. International Journal of Plant Sciences, 1999. 160(6): p. S51-S65.
47. Wilson, H.R. and F. Wilkinson, Detection of global structure in Glass patterns: implications for form vision. Vision Research, 1998. 38(19): p. 2933-2947.
48. Maloney, R.K., G.J. Mitchison, and H.B. Barlow, The limit to the detection of Glass patterns in the presence of noise. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1987. A 4: p. 2336-2341.
49. Navon, D., Forest before the trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 1977. 9: p. 353-383.
50. Alais, D., et al., Local and global factors affecting the coherent motion of gratings presented in multiple apertures. Vision Research, 1998. 38(11): p. 1581-1591.
51. Blough, D.S. and P.M. Blough, Form perception and attention in pigeons. Animal Learning & Behavior, 1997. 25(1): p. 1-20.
52. van Lier, R. and J. Wagemans, Perceptual grouping measured by color assimilation: Regularity versus proximity. Acta Psychologica, 1997. 97(1): p. 37-70.
53. Yin, C., P.J. Kellman, and T.F. Shipley, Surface integration influences depth discrimination. Vision Research, 2000. 40(15): p. 1969-1978.
54. Geiger, D., A. Rudra, and L. Maloney. Features as Sufficient Statistics. in Neural Information Processing Systems. 1997. Denver, Colorado.
55. Shioiri, S. and P. Cavanagh, Achromatic Form Perception Is Based on Luminance, Not Brightness. Journal of the Optical Society of America a-Optics Image Science and Vision, 1992. 9(10): p. 1672-1681.
56. Battelli, L., C. Casco, and G. Sartori, Dissociation between contour-based and texture-based shape perception: A single case study. Visual Cognition, 1997. 4(3): p. 275-310.
57. Saarinen, J. and D.M. Levi, The effect of contour closure on shape perception. Spatial Vision, 1999. 12(2): p. 227-238.
58. Norman, J.F., T.E. Dawson, and S.R. Raines, The perception and recognition of natural object shape from deforming and static shadows. Perception, 2000. 29(2): p. 135-148.
59. Vandamme, W.J.M., F.H. Oosterhoff, and W.A. Vandegrind, Discrimination of 3-D Shape and 3-D Curvature from Motion in Active Vision. Perception & Psychophysics, 1994. 55(3): p. 340-349.
60. Hershberger, W.A. and G.F. Misceo, Touch dominates haptic estimates of discordant visual-haptic size. Perception & Psychophysics, 1996. 58(7): p. 1124-1132.
61. Watanabe, H., et al., Using motor tasks to quantitatively judge 3-D surface curvatures. Perception & Psychophysics, 1999. 61(6): p. 1116-1139.
62. Vandamme, W.J.M. and W.A. Vandegrind, Active Vision and the Identification of 3-Dimensional Shape. Vision Research, 1993. 33(11): p. 1581-1587.
63. Mamassian, P. and H.H. Bülthoff, 1993.
64. Ballesteros, S., S. Millar, and J.M. Reales, Symmetry in haptic and in visual shape perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 1998. 60(3): p. 389-404.
65. Lakatos, S. and L.E. Marks, Haptic form perception: Relative salience of local and global features. Perception & Psychophysics, 1999. 61(5): p. 895-908.
66. Todd, J.T., et al., Effects of texture, illumination and surface reflectance on stereoscopic shape perception. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 1996. 37(3): p. 4282-4282.
67. Todd, J.T., et al., Effects of changing viewing conditions on the perceived structure of smoothly curved surfaces. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 1996. 22(3): p. 695-706.
68. Koenderink, J.J., et al., Shape constancy in pictorial relief. Perception, 1996. 25(2): p. 155-164.
69. Braje, W.L., et al., Illumination effects in face recognition. Psychobiology, 1998. 26(4): p. 371-380.
70. Tarr, M.J., D. Kersten, and H.H. Bulthoff, Why the visual recognition system might encode the effects of illumination. Vision Res, 1998. 38(15-16): p. 2259-75.
71. Todd, J.T., et al., Effects of texture, illumination, and surface reflectance on stereoscopic shape perception. Perception, 1997. 26(7): p. 807-822.
72. Johnston, A. and W. Curran, Investigating shape-from-shading illusions using solid objects. Vision Research, 1996. 36(18): p. 2827-2835.
IV. Shape for Recognition
74. Hulleman, J., W.T. Winkel, and F. Boselie, Concavities as basic features in visual search: Evidence from search asymmetries. Perception & Psychophysics, 2000. 62(1): p. 162-174.
75. Bülthoff, H.H., S.Y. Edelman, and M.J. Tarr, How are three-dimensional objects represented in the brain? Cerebral Cortex, 1995. 5(3): p. 247-260.
76. Biederman, I., Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 1987. 94: p. 115-147.
77. Nair, D. and J.K. Aggarwal, Bayesian recognition of targets by parts in second generation forward looking infrared images. Image and Vision Computing, 2000. 18(10): p. 849-864.
78. Zhu, S.C. and A.L. Yuille, A Flexible Object Recognition and Modelling System. International Journal of Computer Vision, 1996. 20(3): p. 187-212.
79. Bolle, R.M. and D.B. Cooper, Bayesian recognition of local 3- D shape by approximating image intensity functions with quadric polynomials. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. and Machine Intell.,PAMI-6, 1984: p. 418-429.
80. Hummel, J.E. and B.J. Stankiewicz, Categorical relations in shape perception. Spatial Vision, 1996. 10(3): p. 201-236.
81. Hummel, J.E. and B.J. Stankiewicz, Two roles for attention in shape perception: A structural description model of visual scrutiny. Visual Cognition, 1998. 5(1-2): p. 49-79.
82. Tse, P.U., Complete mergeability and amodal completion. Acta Psychologica, 1999. 102(2-3): p. 165-201.
V. Shape for Grasp
84. Santello, M. and J.F. Soechting, Gradual molding of the hand to object contours. J Neurophysiol, 1998. 79(3): p. 1307-20.
85. Kappers, A.M.L., J.J. Koenderink, and G. Oudenaarden, Large scale differences between haptic and visual judgments of curvature. Perception, 1997. 26(3): p. 313-320.
86. Ernst, M.O., M.S. Banks, and H.H. Bulthoff, Touch can change visual slant perception. Nat Neurosci, 2000. 3(1): p. 69-73.
87. Aglioti, S., J.F.X. DeSouza, and M.A. Goodale, Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand. Current Biology, 1995. 5(6): p. 679-685.
VI. Learning
90. Sinha, P. and T. Poggio, Role of learning in three-dimensional form perception. Nature, 1996. 384(6608): p. 460-463.
Perceptual Development
92. Quinn, P.C., C.R. Brown, and M.L. Streppa, Perceptual organization of complex visual configurations by young infants. Infant Behavior & Development, 1997. 20(1): p. 35-46.
93. Wilcox, T., Object individuation: infants' use of shape, size, pattern, and color. Cognition, 1999. 72(2): p. 125-166.
94. Johnson, 2000.
Shape perception and the brain
96. Dobbins, A., S.W. Zucker, and M.S. Cynader, Endstopped neurons in the visual cortex as a substrate for calculating curvature. 1987. 329(6138): p. 438-441.
97. von der Heydt, R., E. Peterhans, and G. Baumgartner, Illusory contours and cortical neuron responses. Science, 1984. 224: p. 1260-1262.
98. Peterhans, E., R. von der Heydt, and G. Baumgartner, Neuronal responses to illusory contours stimuli reveal stages of visual cortical processing., in Visual Neuroscience, J. Pettigrew, K.J. Sanderson, and W.R. Levick, Editors. 1986, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, England. p. 343-351.
99. Peterhans, E. and R. von der Heydt, Mechanisms of contour perception in monkey visual cortex. II. Contours bridging gaps. Journal of Neuroscience, 1989. 9(5): p. 1749-1763.
100. von der Heydt, R. and E. Peterhans, Mechanisms of contour perception in monkey visual cortex. I. Lines of pattern discontinuity. Journal of Neuroscience, 1989. 9: p. 1731-1748.
101. Heitger, F., et al., Simulation of neural contour mechanisms: From simple to end-stopped cells. Vision Research, 1992. 32: p. 963-981.
102. Dresp, B., On ''illusory'' contours and their functional significance. Cahiers De Psychologie Cognitive-Current Psychology of Cognition, 1997. 16(4): p. 489-518.
103. Carman, G.J. and L. Welch, Three-dimensional illusory contours and surfaces. Nature, 1992. 360: p. 585-587.
104. Matthews, N. and L. Welch, The effect of inducer polarity and contrast on the perception of illusory figures. Perception, 1997. 26(11): p. 1431-1443.
105. Tse, P.U., Illusory volumes from conformation. Perception, 1998. 27(8): p. 977-992.
106. Jeannerod, M., Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural visual objects, in Attention and Performance, J. Long and A. Baddeley, Editors. 1981, Erlbaum: Hillsdale. p. 153-168.
107. McClurkin, J.W., J.A. Zarbock, and L.M. Optican, Primate striate and prestriate cortical neurons during discrimination .2. Separable temporal codes for color and pattern. Journal of Neurophysiology, 1996. 75(1): p. 496-507.
108. Roland, P.E., B. O'Sullivan, and R. Kawashima, Shape and roughness activate different somatosensory areas in the human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1998. 95(6): p. 3295-3300.
109. Cowey, A. and L.M. Vaina, Blindness to form from motion despite intact static form perception and motion detection. Neuropsychologia, 2000. 38(5): p. 566-578.
110. Davidoff, J. and E.K. Warrington, A Dissociation of Shape-Discrimination and Figure Ground Perception in a Patient with Normal Acuity. Neuropsychologia, 1993. 31(1): p. 83-93.
111. Kourtzi, Z. and N. Kanwisher, Cortical regions involved in perceiving object shape. Journal of Neuroscience, 2000. 20(9): p. 3310-3318.
112. Medola, 1999.
113. Grill-Spector, K., et al., A sequence of object-processing stages revealed by fMRI in the human occipital lobe. Human Brain Mapping, 1998. 6(4): p. 316-328.
114. Ito, M. and T. Sugata, Visual evoked potentials to geometric forms. Japanese Psychological Research, 1995. 37(4): p. 221-228.
115. Ito, M., T. Sugata, and H. Kuwabara, Visual evoked potentials to geometric forms: Effects of spatial orientation. Japanese Psychological Research, 1997. 39(4): p. 339-344.
116. Ito, M., et al., Visual evoked potentials to the geometric forms in the randomized presentation. Japanese Psychological Research, 1998. 40(2): p. 111-116.
117. Ito, M., et al., Effects of angularity of the figures with sharp and round corners on visual evoked potentials. Japanese Psychological Research, 1999. 41(2): p. 91-101.
118. Beason-Held, L.L., et al., PET reveals occipitotemporal pathway activation during elementary form perception in humans. Visual Neuroscience, 1998. 15(3): p. 503-510.
119. Larsson, J., et al., Neuronal correlates of real and illusory contour perception: functional anatomy with PET. European Journal of Neuroscience, 1999. 11(11): p. 4024-4036.
120. Evans, 2000.
121. von der Heydt, R., H. Zhou, and H.S. Friedman, Representation of stereoscopic edges in monkey visual cortex. Vision Research, 2000. 40(15): p. 1955-1967.
122. Kovacs, G., R. Vogels, and G.A. Orban, Selectivity of Macaque Inferior Temporal Neurons for Partially Occluded Shapes. Journal of Neuroscience, 1995. 15(3): p. 1984-1997.
123. Humphreys, G.W., 2000.
124. Marcel, A.J., Blindsight and shape perception: deficit of visual consciousness or of visual function? Brain, 1998. 121: p. 1565-1588.
125. Merigan, W., A. Freeman, and S.P. Meyers, Parallel processing streams in human visual cortex. Neuroreport, 1997. 8(18): p. 3985-3991.
126. Farah, M.J. and T.E. Feinberg, Consciousness of perception after brain damage. Seminars in Neurology, 1997. 17(2): p. 145-152.
127. Heider, B., Visual form agnosia: Neural mechanisms and anatomical foundations. Neurocase, 2000. 6(1): p. 1-12.
128. Jeannerod, M., et al., Grasping objects: the cortical Mechanisms of visuomotor transformation. Trends in Neurosciences, Review, 1995. 18, No. 7(Trends in Neurosciences, Cambridge, UK): p. 314-320.
129. Bodegard, A., et al., Object shape differences reflected by somatosensory cortical activation in human. Journal of Neuroscience, 2000. 20(1): p. RC51-U8.
130. Faillenot, I., J. Decety, and M. Jeannerod, Human brain activity related to the perception of spatial features of objects. Neuroimage, 1999. 10(2): p. 114-24.
131. Colby and Goldberg, 1999.
132. Goodale, M.A. and A.D. Milner, Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neuroscience, 1992. 15(1): p. 20-25.
133. Humphrey, G.K., et al., A neurological dissociation between shape from shading and shape from edges. Behavioural Brain Research, 1996. 76(1-2): p. 117-125.
134. Milner, P.M., A Model For Visual Shape Recognition. Psychological Review, 1974. 81(6): p. 521-535.